Ark Of Mono Thought

One ominous symbol is prominently brandished, yet lurks in the shadows cast by more popular symbolism of each of the worlds three most influential, monotheistic faiths. It has somehow gone largely unnoticed through the age. The trinity of Abrahmic faiths centers around the shape of a cube, the symbolic representation of space, or 3rd dimension, aka 3D. Although they employ the cube in various ways, the meaning behind and between them might just be coherently meaningful.

No, that’s not an image of the Islamic Kaba in Mecca, it’s the Christian Kingdom of Heaven. We begin with the end. The heavenly eternity they all strive for is described in the Christian book of “Revelations” as a cube.

Rev 21:16 The city is laid out as a square; its length is as great as its breadth. And he measured the city with the reed: twelve thousand furlongs. Its length, breadth, and height are equal.

The primary factor behind the perceived need for monotheistic dogma, throughout these three religions, is damnation. Damnation, which in it’s simplest and least offensive form, is a world absent the goodness of God or God “Himself”. This is the problem in a classic Hegelian Dialect, a problem-reaction-solution scenario. Damnation-Fear-Salvation. The imaginary threat of damnation drives the faithing masses to follow, like cattle the leaders of their respective species of faith. The result of which is perpetual animosity and hell on Earth, which is the closest concept to Hell in the Hebrew faith. This hell is life on Earth before their more political, war lord type messiah comes to save them, quite corporeally. They are Damned until the end, rather than damned or saved in the end.

Three Damning Religions, 3D religion. Damnation is separation from God. The cubical Christian “Kingdom of God” also has a wall around it.

Rev 21:17 Then he measured its wall: one hundred and forty-four cubits, according to the measure of a man, that is, of an angel.

The cube’s six sidedness being secretly sacred to each member in this trinity of religions, reflects the infamous number 666. The number of man and beast according to the New Testament has come to be a symbol for evil and Antichrist within the Jesus faith, though scripturally it is clearly the number of Man.

“This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. That number is 666.” -Revelations 13:18

While silently resonating damnation via this reference to three sixes, these three belief systems claim to be tools of salvation, protecting us from Hell. Like the ancient Greek Cerberus, a three headed beast of avarice, and guardian dog of the underworld, just as Inubis was god dog of the dead in Kemet.

Well the Merkaba, hexagram (another six) or star of David, a symbol associated with the Jews, is nothing less than a soul ship for astral/interdimensional travel, in Hebrew mysticism and elswhere. Looking through two corners of a cubes frame reveals the image of this six pointed star, a hexagram inside a hexagon.

A three dimensional cube folds out into a two dimensional cross, wich Christians use as an idol of worship for Jesus.

As alluded to at the top, Muslims circle round a cube of stone & curtains. Now usually empty, this veil through wich to worship Allah was a place for the worship of other idols in pre Islamic times.

The Hebrew bible depicts God as a myst hovering over or resting on an Ark. The Ark of the covenant, containing the Laws of Yaweh. Was the throne of Yahweh a box for God or god’s box… of what? Laws, mental and physical limitations for man.

Hebrews wear a cube, to represent said throne, on their foreheads in worship of Yaweh. A forehead box of laws, a box for heads?

They also wear one, the hand Tefillin, on the weaker arm’s bicep. The meaning of which is that they can not defeat their enemies without God.

Arq in Kemet was to contain, Barq to segregate or separate and Kemit used these words for the often cube like coffers, upon which they depicted their idols, and the boats they placed them on. Kemet gods, long before Israel, were on boxes.

What prescious treasure could all these gods be guarding in the box?

In contrast to the freedom of dimensional travel suggested by the Merkaba doctrine, Jesus speaks of the eternal cube city and “the Son of Man” coming to us, from above,

Matt 16:28 “Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.”

“In his kingdom”, a giant, cubical city.

Jesus put himself in a box here, in two ways. One, he is literally descending in the cubical heaven from the infinite heavens. Two, he limits the end times to within his own generation. How is this not an obvious, miserable failure?

Our three headed Cerberus guards souls from leaving the underworld and the Chinese symbol for prison is a square box, with a man in it. Our contemporary Jack, is in the box, – the dog god Inubis’ head is often seen specifically as a jackal, Jack Al/El-. El of course is an odd little girl from the 80s gifted with psychic powers.. and also happens to be the name of the Hebrew God before it decided to conveniently change its name to YAWE changehis head being enlarged, like the box on Hebrew heads, it is Jack’s thought that is emphasized, thought in a box. His thoughts are not his own, they are collective programming. This mysterious cube is a box for thought.

Should the good skeptic still be in doubt of the rather consistent meaning of the box, Star Trek’s Borg Collective seems very convenient.

From cradle to grave, every human system, orgonization, or ism seems to be indoctrinating faith into our minds via the word believe. While belief can be based on evidence or faith, when one is advised to believe without evidence present to justify reason for said belief, it is an irrational faith belief they are advocating.

Believe in God.
Believe in the universe.
Believe in yourself.
Even that which has evidence for reasonable belief, can be believed in by faith, if the evidence is not the base for the belief held.
Believe in evolution.
Believe in man made global cooling or warming or just change in general.

Many people are convinced by this all pervasive faith brainwashing, that one must “believe” in something.
If we have no choice, but to believe, then why would we need to be constantly bombarded with the suggestion that we believe?

Corporate department stores (“Big Box” companies) even sell lovely little wood carved affirmations that simply say “believe”. In what? Based on what? Why?

Beliefs based on reason do not develope because one was told to believe, but because of evident truths, facts and evidence. If reasonable belief is what was sought, then the word would be “reason” not “believe”.

Wether it’s Sunday school, music, public/private school, family or friends, the Borg or Disney, “pretend to know” is the message and it is violent road to mindless masses in opposition.

Does, “When you wish upon a star” sound more like, “You will be assimilated” yet? No? Well, consider how prayers to gods are so similar to wishes at wells and shooting stars.

An idol is an image that represents what one believes, by faith, to be the (or a) True God. Gods like any idealism or dogma in general, control thought through faith in the truth of them.

“Ask and it shall be given, seek and you will find, knock and the for will open.”

One cannot honestly seek truth if one has determined, by faith, one has already found it. If one cannot seek, how can one find?

As gravity holds Saturn’s rotation, it’s moons and
rings in orbit round it’s northern hexogon storm, so faith holds minds locked in orbit around it’s object.

Jack (man) is the source of the psychological energy, this law of faith persay. The object, the idol, is irrelavent. They are all psychological tools that only trigger what we are programed for. We use them to improve our lives individually, while our devotion is generally used to collectively destroy the lives at the whims of pedophies, cons, war profiteers, sychopaths and even genuinely honest, but misguided believing leaders of these faiths. Faith makes useful idiots.

The box and idol represent a narrow path or track for your thoughts, called faith. A box for thinking. An unprovable idea, like God, is nothing more than that. God is an idea, a thought.

An ark is a container, a prison whose bars are forged in the heat of faith meaning they are no stronger than curtains, the only thing keeping us behind them, is our will, better the lack there of. The apathy of content gorrillas in open cages are our self made prisons. The prisoner is thought. Faith, being a pretence to knowledge that arrests the ability to consider alternative thought. A mind unable to consider alternative thought, has no free thought.

How has this incessant desire to believe one knows, trumped the need to admit ignorance in order and seek to true knowledge?

Is it fear of the unknown, attachment to the familiar, tribal loyalty, peer pressure? Perhaps all of these.

Whatever the cause, in choosing answers short of reason, we are creating false maps of the world. A false map won’t lead to the destination, but perhaps by minute chance. It will however divide people.

To decide one knows the truth without evidence, Allying one’s self to an unseen, unknowable, silent monotheistic God, is to put alleged infinite being in a box, but more affectively it means apposing those who ally with any apparently foreign God concept.

It is no question that malevolent or benevolent, leaders of these faiths often lead faithing people to their doom. The Faithing masses are proudly herded like sheep. Faith makes useful idiots of otherwise intelligent people.

These otherwise intelligent people carry a virus of ignorance. They pass it on to anyone who will accept it. They oblige their children to be infected. This virus is called faith, and is represented by a box, a box for thought.

There is a cure. It is reason. It starts with admitting ignorance, and follows with fresh open skeptic eyes doing due diligence to achieve actual knowledge. Objective ruth cannot be determined subjectively, and faith is subjective; it is opinion, unjustifiably promoted to the status of truth.

As long as our idea of truth is based on opinion, we will divide only more. Dogma evolves, each generation slightly mutant from the last, each sibling in opposition to it’s own kind, all because of make believe.

Basing beliefs on reason means coming to much more similar conclusions. This works for all thinking, including morals.

The oppression of women and homosexuals, genital mutilation and slavery’s rein depended on Faith. Reason brought on emancipation and liberty for them all.

Faith is war, reason is peace.

Faith is intellectually dishonest.
Lying, especially to one’s self, is immoral, exceptions noted.
Faith is immoral.




HEPNEN (Holliday for Every Person & New Era Nativity) Oriontation

Hep is the Kemetian word for solstice or turning.

Nen is Kemetian for Winter Solstice, or inactivity.

(Kemetian is ancient Egyptian).

They are here used together as an acronym,

Holliday for






It represents an alignment of stars that counts down and points to the annual rebirth of the sun, the actual new year, when the Sunrise begins to move north at “Christmas”.

Oriontation is a 10 point description of this amazing alignment.

1. High visibility.

This is an alignment involving 4 prominent celestial elements.

  • Orion’s Belt, the most prominent constellation.
  • Sirius, the brightest fixed star.
  • Tureis, a star at the tip of the stern on the largest constellation of all, Argo, the Ark.
  • The one and only creator/savior, Son of God, the Sun

2. A string of pearls on Gaia’s belt.

A Trinity of priceless pearls.

Orion’s belt is one of the two best known, most recognized constellations in each hemisphere. Three stars closely aligned in a row, so clear that it can’t be missed. In Kemet it was the Crown of Sah (aka Osiris), in Arabic the string or girdle of pearls. Its orientation and brightness demand attention.

A belt on a belt.

Orion’s belt rides the celestial equator, rising on the Eastern line and seting on the Western line. Orion’s belt is on the Eastern or Western line and the horizon from somewhere in the world at all times.

As these three stars rise, the uppermost star, Alnitak, aligns within 2° of the crosshairs of the eastern line and horizon and the western crosshairs at setting.

Durring the equinoxes, the sun follows the same path as Orion’s belt; again, rising on the Eastern line and setting on the Western.

This alignment demands human regard, yet who is aware that the god itself, Sol, Sah, our Sun aligns its path with the celestial equator riding belt constellation, which men once called the image & crown of the sun in the stars?


3. The #3 & Symbolism coincidence

The Hindu Aum 🕉 looks like a number 3. In fact the digit ‘3’ is Hindu, Sanscrit that is.. these two of four arches in the aum represent the 2 states of conscious awareness, waking and dreaming.

We happen to use variations of the same symbol to represent the number (3) of these stars, for East (E) and for West (W) and the sun is metaphorically dead for three days during the solstice, as the sun stands still. An annual traumatic event for primitive minds. Ancient man couldn’t ignore the winter solstice if he wanted to. Again the demand for attention!

4. The Myth of Jesus’ Nativity Veils The Actual New Year.

The exaultation of Jesus as “light of the world” shines so bright, it blots out the actual light of the world, the Sun. Even among Christians, it is well known that a historical Jesus would not have been born Dec 25th. Astrotheologists say that Jesus’ nativity is a metaphor for the winter solstice. They follow Early Christians pairing Orion’s belt up with with the Three Kings and consider Sirius as the Star of Bethlehem and Jesus birth, along with his death and resurrection, with the rebirth of the Sun, after its three day limbo (rising in the same place for 3 days on the horizon and moving northward for the first time of the year around 12/25 (Actual New Years day). This was common astrological mythology, myth referring to truth.

5. An i in the sky.

Incidentally the belt line of Orion is often called a staff or rod and it also aligns with the Brightest fixed star in the sky, Sirius, the dog star. Christians of old refered to the belt as the 3 Kings. It has also been seen as a staff. In Ballam’s 4th oracle (Numbers 24:17) A star and a staff rise as the signs of the coming messiah, the Son of God, Sun of God or Sun God.

EYE 3y3 i !

A modern subjective eye might see a star or a dot above a staff or a line as an “i” (eye), in the sky. And/Or perhaps an exclamation point for emphasis!

6. Sirius Yin Yang Dualism on a Double Helix.

Sirius is actually 2 stars (a binary system). A, massive and bright, the other, b, a dim dwarf.

Sirius A blots out Sirius b, just as the nativity of “God’s Son blots out the nativity of the Sun.

As binary stars orbit each other and travel through the galaxy, their paths create a double helix pattern and they can exchange mass, light becomes dark and dark becomes light. The name of this star in Kemet, was “sopdet”, meaning sharp point. Like an arrow for direction to…

7. The Ark’s Possession, The Door.

Following through the Sopdet point from the staff of Sah we come to Argo, the Ark (ship) in the sky. Specifically a star called Tureis, on the tip of the stern of this ship, is most directly in line. Tureis means possession in Arabic, bringing to mind Christmas gifts and santa clause, through the end of Ballam’s 4th Oracle, “red and hary shall be his possessions”. Tureis Greek name is Aspis meaning shield. The long shields of the Romans were called Thureos (ÂżTureis?), meaning door. Many cultures from all periods have regarded the winter solstice as a gateway to and from other world(s), while red and harry Santa makes doors through space time, the 4th dimension. Meanwhile similar to Turais is Turiah, Hindu for the 4th state of consciousness, nothingness.

8. The Opening Of NEN’s Gate To The Resurection, Revolution, After Life.

During the Winter Solstice the Sun and Tureis POSSESS the same path (-23.5°) through the sky, rising and setting in the same places on the horizon for about 30 days. Around the world myths have made alegory of the winter solstice with a portal to the other side, even Sci-fi/fantacy flicks love using portals to alternate dimensions, like Star Gates…

9. Lock & Key

While the Sun is rising, Tureis (here labeled with it’s Greek designation, Rho Pup) is setting. They are synced to perfection, POSSESSING the rise and set locations of both on the horizon at the same time.

10. T Minus 3 to New Year’s rising.

By chronological order and count of stars,

Orion’s belt 3, Sirius 2, Tureis 1.

3.2..1… New year Sol Rise.

Its a cellestial countdown, written in stars, pointing to the actual new year, the portal through and alignment in time and space.

Like, share and create your own unique celebration. Lets start celebrating this real and amazing event in ways anyone can appreciate. A New Year solstice for all witing eyes to see.

On to SOLSTICE SHADOWS – Begin the deep dive into mysterious HEPNEN symbolism.


ICHTHYOS – On fish symbolism.

EPiPHiNi? – Explaining the SYNCPHANY logo, the i of EPiPHiNi.

Syncphany Store – Various prints of your favorite SYNCPHANY art.


Darkness is lack of light. It is an uncreated, unmanifested nothing.

Seeing how darkness is the absence of light, It is a bit strange that “darkness” is a noun, but then again, “nothing” is also, somehow, a noun.


“Light does have weight, meaning that it is a source of gravitational fields. A box of light weighs more than an empty box. The reason is that ALL forms of energy have weight. However, under ordinary earthly conditions, the weight of light is insignificant compared to other weights.

Mike W.”

SOURCE; GOOGLE Result from search for, “Does Light Have weight?”.

Darkness, it turns out, is lighter than light.


I’m going to tell you the truth. I’m going to say it in one word at the end of this Blablog. But, if you don’t know what the split screen experiment is, you will not understand and will probably repel, the truth.
According to split screen Theory, any event of existence, manifestation or actuality can only take place upon observation.
 Nothing exists until it is seen or sensed. 
If no one ever observes the truth, is there one?
Often two people who experience the same event will remember it differently.
It was a short-lived peace of mind when photographs were worth a thousand words, because everyone knew memory is fallible. 

Enter photoshop.
Back to the truth. 

Back to reality.
Reality is pure potential. Reality is. Reality is False. Not a possible Actuality. 
In physics, there are an infinite number of secondary variables for an un-numbered amount of dials for setting the “laws” of the universe, at which we would not exist.
There is only one setting for each of those unnumbered “laws”, where we can, and do, exist. The actual only exists because we observe.
(Read carefully here)

Actuality is Experienced when Reality (Infinity / Eternity [the lifetime of the Allmighty]) becomes (collapsed into the [lifetime of man]) Observed (fragment of Reality) into finitude. 
Actual facts can be known, but the Truth cannot.
The Truth is False. False because its a misnomer. Its Truly irrelevant. 

Truth is Myth.
Whatever a believer believes, is true, because everything is false. 
It is not there any more than not.
It is here and there and not,

and all the above.
If you skipped to the end to see “The Truth”, the truth is I lied, I wrote the Truth three paragraphs above this (at the end), the end of this blablog. 


ICHTHYOS 3.1 0ztar Bunny

Meet the 0ztar Bunny, short for the zero and one Easter rabbit.

To translate these words from different cultures around the world into a sentence….
The beautiful balance point is a shell of zero & a full spectrum of illusory separation from nothingness in the observers silent eye.

The Egyptian NEFER is the rabbits nose. It means beautiful, ballance and zero.
The Mayan XIXIM (pronounced shishim) is the right eye. It is a conch shell which stands for zero.
The sanscrit (Hindu) Maya is the mouth. Teeth have been added to represent the spectrum of light. Maya means illusion of separation.
The Sanscrit (Hindu) TURIAH (or Shunia) is appropriately depicted as the third eye dot on the forehead. It is the fourth state of consciousness, namely unconsciousness, silence.
The Hebrew AYIN is represented in two versions, as the fish shaped outline of the rabbits head (fish tail = rabbit ears) and the left eearsThe latter is a glyph of an eye and Ayin is a silent letter.

The mouth also represents creation or existence via the word

“God spoke and there was light.”

Thus the light spectrum as teeth.

The dot (Turiah) is also the rabbit hole. The gateway to the Self. The History Channel tells us that the Ancient Egyptians depicted the stars in the constellation of Lepus (our rabbitt) as the boat which Osiris (the Sun) or Ra (our Orion) stood upon, in his nightly journey through the underworld. This boat, “History Channel” also tells us, might actually be a cryptic depiction of a wormhole, etched by ancient aliens or familial likenesses to wormhole travel that primitive humans observed.

Interestingly enough the wormhole theory is as myth as the supposed ancient constellation arrangement of Ra’s Boat being in the local of the modern Lepus. Turns out these are modern star lore about ancient star lore, mele mythology, Rabid holes about wormholes within within rabid holes. Babushka!

Amazingly, along with the rabbit and dimensional gateway symbolism here, the Hebrew, Egyptian and Mayan symbols draw a familiar illustration. That of Easter eggs.

SYNCPHANY is a blog all about these types of coincidences. I use the term acausal syncretism to refer to them. Acausal syncretism is akin to synchronicity, but separate in time and space where synchronicity requires relatively close proximity in time and space between events. Instances where separate fields of thought accidentally merge together through meaning and symbolism, transcending or violating the bounds of time and space. You can read more about zero and one Here @ ICHTHYOS 3, NUN 0/1 and God’s Mysterious Pencil.

Or browse through the menu to find many other incredible connections of meaning and symbol, that subjectively transcend the bounds of time and space.

Happy Easter, Ishtar, or East Star, from the 0ztar Bunny, ViGiL and

Other Syncphany pages

EPiPHiNi? – Explaining the SYNCPHANY logo, the i of EPiPHiNi

HEPNEN – How the stars align for “Christmas”.

Syncphany Store – Various prints of your favorite SYNCPHANY art.

Pearl of Epiphany the Prime Imprinter


Above, the original draught of the Pearl of Epiphany.

Everything this author has learned about the psyche, sync, coincidence, and everything that will be read in “Syncphany” (the blog) and “Epiphany” (the book) began with the Pearl of Epiphany, a symbol that makes one of many views. So it is the appropriate symbol from which to begin sharing the perspective of symbols it has become and through it introduce the content of SYNCPHANY.

The Pearl of Epiphany was originally meant to be simply five symbol primarily recognized as representing the major role playing religions of the world in the age of Pisces put together to represent the objective unity and syncretism that pervades throughout theology.

Syncretism is the cogent and complimentary combining of various fields of thought. It shows a, preexisting, common bond between them, which may or may not have been recognized before or ever intended.

The Pearl of Epiphany is literally a visual syncretism of metaphor, lore, tradition and myth through popular association of symbols to the primary social spiritual powers of the age of Pisces.

The idea of the worlds religions working together and pointing to one or more unified truths is not anything new. There are a myriad of different theologians, philosophers and even accademics who have articulated examples in innumerable ways. C.G. Jung is one who stands out among these for his work with the concept of Archetypes. Joseph Cambell illuminated the specifics of the Hero Archetype.

Although, the effort here, to visually symbolize such a unity, disembodies the concept of archetypes, in so much as geometric symbols are absent any personal charachter, it is none the lesss and infact perhaps more directly a valid form of archetype, due to the definition of the word. Archetype means Prime imprinter.

Further the image is formed in such a perfect arrangement of geometry and meaning that it unveils forgotten and all together unknown, ancient symbolism piced together by the combination.

The initial concept was specifically inspired by the several ways in which just one man, Huston Smith, put it, prior to any understanding of Archetypes.

“Signposts are not the destination, maps are not the terrain. Life is too rich and textured to be fitted into pigeonholes, let alone equated with them. No affirmation is more than a finger pointing to the Moon.”

“Religions begin by assuring us that if we could see the full picture we would find it more integrated than we would normally suppose.”

“It is as if life were a great tapestry, which we face from its wrong side. This gives it the appearance of a maze of knots and threads, which for the most part appear chaotic.”

“The beauty and harmony of the design derive from the way its parts are related, the design confers on these parts a significance that we, seeing only scraps of the design, do not normally perceive.”
Houston Smith

In pursuit of symbolizing the truth behind these words and Over the course of about 2 years, these “scraps” (symbols) were arranged and rearranged in an effort to find the most economical and meaningful way to view them.

It was not until the following quote, by a Native American shaman, was considered that they were finally, quite appropriately, perhaps providentially, placed in what seems even a strangely obvious orientation, superimposed within a circle.

“Everything Tries to be round.”
Black Elk

It seems that EPiPHiNY is not, or perhaps not only, the creation of a single artist, but an inevitable cause of the develoupments in human consciousness from the last of the 20th and first of the 21st centuries. One might even say it is the logical product of an all inclusive view of religion and mythology in the modern age. Armed only with one of the concepts of love, equality and understanding, emersed in a social environment of accletic blending of everthing from myths to genders, how much chance was there that one of the millions of modern minds on the subject would not stumble upon this wonderous EPiPHiNY?

Is it not cogent to think it highly unlikely that no flower child/hippie of the 60s, no LCD tripping bell bottomed trancer from the seventies, nor the artisticly prolific star and rainbow children, lightworker or awakeners nor even the scholarly academics such as Jung and Cambell, no Ellron or Crawly, Acharia, Blavatski nor Smith would ever happen upon this combination?

Not to mention the all but invisible individual, who finnally did manifest EPiPHiNY, does not even identify, let alone practise as an artist, but as a curious, informally educated, accidental symbolist, and one who believes in nothing to boot, investigating possibilities without a hint of agenda other than the acquisition of understanding and truth.

Over years of work many more improbable coincidences surrounding this symbol were unveiled through the research that followed. These improbable phenomena revealed a deeper, subjective, unconscious layer of meaning being knit together through historical events, various trains of thought, scripture and, of course symbolism.

So totally unknown and down right incredible were these connections (Syncs) that they warented, perhaps even demanded, more than a personal research. The import of the meaning, the living truth emerging through a perspective simultaneously novel and ancient, compelled a student to become also a teacher. So begin the lessons.

Scraps of the Prime Imprinter, the Pearl of Epiphany


Above, second draught.

The five Symbols are; the (green) Crescent Moon of Islam, it represents the moon, associated primarily as a female, the Arch or Ark, the womb of God or gods.

The (blue) Aum of Hinduism, which, in short, is a representation of the vibration or sound of the universes creation, evolution and end.

The (yellow) Star of David of Judaism, which stands primarily for male and female or dualistic relationships aka polarity is rumored to be produced when Hindu (the true Origin of the symbol) monks chant “AUM” onto a sand covered metal surface (tonograph).

The (black & white) Yin Yang of Buddhism or Taoism, which stands for a kind of philosophical relativism.

Finally the (brown) Cross of Christianity, which stands for ultimate sacrifice, salvation and forgiveness, the Staff, the male, seed of God or gods.

Epiphany Outlining The Solstice Shadow.


Above, third Draught.

The deeper unconscious archetypal meaning referred to above is centered around a piece of the puzzle which proved difficult to symbolize without major taboos getting in the way.

It was of great importance to this draughtsman to include a symbol to represent what seemed to be the root of all religion. Namely, the medicine man or shaman’s perspective, which had been the key to finding the order of the chaos that arranged the symbols in what seems to be the correct positions, due to the resulting symbol that filled the aforementioned shamanic symbolism bill. Although the symbols were already arranged in the circular frame that solved the puzzle and produced the mushroom shape, the solstice shadow did not stand out to tell the uninformed viewer that it was there. The only two symbols that had been considered for representing shamanism, in the Pearl of Epiphiny, were the swastika and the pentagram, unfortunately both are littered with negative associations across the dogmatic traditions of the world. Of course the meanings of both have long been highjacked in the minds of western civilization, by dark and negative definitions. They would serve mostly as repellent to too many innocent or ignorant eyes. And in experimentation their presence was not so pleasing to the eyes anyhow. So, for the time being, the shaman was thought to be left out.

As it turned out, the shamanistic progenitor of religion was hidden inside the Pearl all along. The image of a mushroom was constellated by the ‘correct’ arrangement of these symbols.

Among its many facets, there are two contextually important aspects of nature from which shaman have gained knowledge of it. They are the macrocosmic stars and the microcosmic plants.

Although they are technically a fungus, Mushrooms are included in the microcosmic list of plant teachers. Science and Dogma were not always distinct, making it unlikely that an ancient shaman would have any ear for an academic breakdown on the difference in genre of a Tamarix tree and of an Amanita mushroom. Of all holy vegetation, and what not, the mushroom forms the most distinctive, and simple shape available, in regard to potential for visual symbolism.

The Solstice Shadow is the authors name for a set of identical Egyptian hieroglyphs shaped like mushrooms, that stand for solstice, turning or shadow.


*Bottom left, below, shows the Egyptian mushroom shape to be specific to the winter solstice. As -from the Northern Hemisphere- the Sun is farthest South at Winter Solstice.


Strangely enough, prior to the discovery of mushroom shaped hieroglyphs, the mushroom shape had already been brought out upon recognition of its resemblance to the solstice alignment; along with the correlation of the number of intersections along the mushroom’s center in EPiPHiPHiNY to the number of stars in the solstice alignment. Finding this hieroglyph was one of the most jaw dropping experiences this author has had.

In the spirit of unity -the inspiration for creating the pearl- all three Egyptian meanings (shadow, turning and solstice) are compiled together for a single and whole understanding of the symbol. As result the meaning of ‘Solstice Shadow’ is two fold.

The solstices are turning points from light to dark and back again, internally as without. So the turning of shadows, over any period of time or area of space, within reach of the shadows, between the ends of the dualistic spectrum of light and dark.

The meaning dualism is mirrored external to internal.
The external (macrocosmic) meaning is the path of the Sun and turn of the seasons from the dark of Winter to the light of spring in the world perceived outside of the observer.
Just as the life of the world is lit and lives by the Sun (light of the world), so psyche, reason and emotion are lit and live by consciousness. The internal meaning then is light as conscious awareness and knowledge while dark is a lack thereof, whether due to inexperience or suppconsciousDark content is unconscious or subconscious.Both the experience of psychedelics on the inside and the turning of the winter solstice are processes of enlightenment, lighting the dark. The solstice shadow then seams to mean enlightenment or, in a jungian senset it means individuation, coming to balance by consciously incorporating ones dark parts into an accepted asspect of one’s humanity.

In Egyptian Hieroglyphs, an Arch (usually red or yellow) is representative of bread and the phonetic sound of the letter ‘T’.


Incidentally outlined in the Pearl of Epiphany are both the Arc and T-shape of the Solstice Shadow. The outline of an Arc is made by the meeting of the tops of the (green) Crescent and the (blue) Aum which together form an arch, a perfect outline of a mushroom head, the rising Sun, and the yet unknown annual possession of the solar path by Tureis; of the constellation Argo, the Ark, which is to be described in the first chapter of the Solstice Shadows.

The significance of this simple little symbol (a bent line) was the tip of the iceberg, feather on top, or the catalyst (also to be read about elsewhere; namely in the mepiphany category) for writing this work (Epiphany/Syncphany). Of course, just below The Arch (wich is now outlined in red) is the T-shape, also already present in the Epiphany symbol.

Within this image containing symbols that represent the five major role playing religions of the world today, super imposed within a circle, are five intersections of the vertical center line and each horizontal line, as if X’s (more aptly +’s) were marking the space for each set of stars in the Solstice Shadow. The stars and their intersections are as follows from top to bottom of the vertical line at the center, marked in the example above by orange dots; except for the Sun which is instead a red arch and Tureis or Rho Pup, which is not represented, because it is, as yet, unknown to the public. The names associated with each are to the right of this illustration and the meanings thereof are included below.

Detail is very important here so here is an in depth description of how the stars of the winter solstice within the Solstice Shadow fit into Epiphany.

The stars of the winter solstice are fixed in the sky in a specific order and therefore their positions within these symbosl are like the Solstice Shadow in Epiphany, automatic or mechanical.


*The Rising Sun / Tureis- Possessor of the Argo constellation.

At the top of the entire symbol where the top of the (blue) Aum and the (green) Crescent meet, along with the top of the (black & white) Yin Yang’s S curve and the tip of the upward facing triangle of the (yellow) Star of David. The (red) Arc fills the space between the top of the circle and the upper horizontal line and represents the synchronized path of these two stars during the winter solstice. Also the shape of the Sun as it rises and the local of Tureis in Argo which is located at the very top and center.

Note again that this star remains unrepresented as it remains unknown even to most people who consider themselves informed of the star alignments of the winter solstice. It is still in the shadow of consciousness, and it is, therefore, providential that it should be located at the head of the symbol of the Solstice Shadow.

*Sirius Sothis- Vesica Pisces = () = cunjunction = Female, Isis = Cobra = Pearl= Tooth of Serpent,

Placed in the intersection of the Cross. Where also lies the center of the horizontal line of the downward facing triangle in the Star of David and the location of the white dot of the Yin Yang.

Note that the symbol () (Vesica Pisces) represents the tertium comparationis, which is what two things have in common, and it just so happens to go directly on the intersection of the cross, (i.e. the location that The horizontal and vertical have in common) and The white dot of the Yin Yang, which is what gives the black side a common value to the White side of the Yin Yang.

*Mintaka- Belt

This star is dead center of the entire work. Where the Yin Yang meets the upper and lower arches of the Aum.

*Alnilam- String of Pearls

At the base line of the upward facing triangle in the Star of David and The location of the black dot of the Yin Yang.

*Alnitak- Girdle

At the bottom where lies another intersection of the Aum, Crescent, Yin Yang and downward point of the Star of David.


So there you have it, somehow, this symbol, an Egyptian hieroglyph for solstice, turning and shadow, which stands for the mushroom and outlines the stars of the winter solstice (a shamanistic symbol of consciousness and shadow), ends up outlined by a, seemingly inevitable, super imposition of the symbols of all of the major religions of the world today.

Epiphany’s Eye of One Frame


Once the Egyptian corelation was identified, the inclusion of an Egyptian symbol in the picture was not only warranted, but essentially required.

Although the symbol of life called ‘Ankh’ would fit in beautifully, it seemed as if it would only be redundant imagery, as the ankh, mushroom and cross were all very similar. Even the cross has an Inner i.


In fact, if one were to ask the Bibles red letters for advice as to a symbol that represents unity, the most relevant answer would have to be Mathew 6:22, which must be examined closely or at least read in two or more different translations;

“The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.”
King James

“The eye is the lamp of the body. So, if your eye is healthy, your whole body will be full of light,”

The key here is the interchanged words ‘healthy’ vs ‘single’.

The definition ‘single’ or ‘healthy’ is synonymous with the Eye of Horus, which is called ‘wjt’ in Egyptian, Which sounds like what you get if you read WWJD like a word, rather than an acronym. The exact definitions of ‘wjt’ are ‘the uninjured eye of Horus (Ra)’, therefore the healthy eye, or ‘the whole one’, thus the single. Now Add to that Jesus as the pearl of great price, plus the common allegory of pearls used in the Koran ie, “eyes like pearls”, then the Hindu concept of Indra’s Pearly net; “a string of Pearls so arranged that all are reflected in one; not to forget that the ‘Eye of Ra’ is a picture of the center of the brain; the pupil being the penial gland which calcifies with age, resembling the development of pearls as they accumulate nacre secreted by their creators, the often vesica pieces shaped oysters.

There you have the sum and reasoning for both the ‘wjt’, the ‘whole one’ being the frame around the Pearl and the name of the pupil in ‘Epiphany’ being the ‘Pearl of Epiphany’.


Above, Final product, “EPIPHANY”.

One would be hard-pressed to find a representative of any one of these religions that does not apply holly tradition and celebration to some span of time surrounding the Winter Solstice. They all do this whether their members are aware of it, or (more often) not. Whether their eyes are whole or divided.


The Hebrew and esspescially the Christian believer would not likely attribute credit to their God for, or even agree to there being anything significant about these incredible facts. More than likely the ironic response would be that it was all chance. In fact it has already been said that
“there is no basis for this.”

Although some would surely attribute the credit to Satan, the great trickster. This is because several of the main stream religions do not acknowledge any divine ordinance in other faiths; believe that only the ‘evil one’, the ‘deceiver’ would arrange things in such a way, as to mislead souls from “God’s truth.

And there you have it… The division and illness of seeing only one side, perceiving only by a fraction of the available senses.


Regardless of bias and belief, in all honesty the only rational explanation is that the relationships described here are acausal (synchronistic) syncretisms of visual homonym. That seconded only by a conspiracy theory of globally ancient proportions.

But just maybe..


Next up, HEPNEN – How the stars align for “Christmas”.


ICHTHYOS – On fish symbolism.

EPiPHiNi? – Explaining the SYNCPHANY logo, the i of EPiPHiNi.

Syncphany Store – Various prints of your favorite SYNCPHANY art.

ICHTHYOS 3 NUN 0/1 & God’s Mysterious Pencil

In Egyptian Mythology the Waters of Chaos predated all of existence, including the creator god, and were represented by the Anthropomorphic god Nun.

Despite all the various Creation myths that the Egyptians subscribed to, they had one thing in common, Nun. Even though the myths named different gods as the original creator, they all agreed that he sprang from Nun, the primordial waters. Nun was more than an ocean, he was a limitless expanse of motionless water. Even after the world was created, Nun continued to exist at it’s margins and would one day return to destroy it and begin the cycle again.

Our modern creation theories, most commonly, assume that absolutely everything was created by God, who is the only uncreated existence, without exception. Although the book most commonly refered to as the Athority on creation does not actually articulate this as fact. It is an assumtion made by Biblical creation believers, that the creation of water is included in the creation of Earth.

“In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth.”

Earth: Strong’s H776, erets – earth, land.

Here we can see that The Bible gives no literal account for the creation of water. 

2. And the Earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

There is also not a record here for the creation of darkness, and as the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters, Darkness was upon the face of the deep (waters).

One may assume there creation, if belief requires, but the words are simply not there. Both the Water and the Earth are said to have been formless and void; and both the words for deep or sea and darkness are themselves nothingness. The word for water is formlessness and, more importantly, key word, unreality.

Without Form: Strong’s H8414, tohu- formlessness, confusion, unreality, emptiness.

Void: Strongs H922, bohu- emptiness, void.

Darkness: Strong’s H2822, choshek- darkness, night, obscurity,

 The Deep: Strong’s H8415, tehom- confusion, empty place, without form, nothing, vain, vanity, waste.

Or thom {teh-home’}; (usually feminine) from huwm; an abyss (as a surging mass of water), especially the deep (the main sea or the subterranean water-supply) — deep (place), depth.

Now there are two words for water used here; one is the deep and the other is the waters. Although the sense of nothingness, of uselessness is repeated by the meaning of waste.

Waters: Strong’s H4325, mayim- water, waste, loins, course.

Interestingly we have here a trinity of uncreated unthings; the Spirit of God, the Deep/waters, and the Dark are uncreated and exist atop the waters. The Deep, Dark Spirit of God, with all meanings considered, sounds very much like unconscious.

Later, in verses six and seven of Genesis one, God divides the waters above from the waters below. As if to separate consciousness from unconsciousness. Then, in verse nine, He gathers the waters below into one place separating them from earth to make the dry land.

Apearently God’s first three creations -the Heavens, Earth and light- were all made within the prexistant waters.
Disclaimer on zero.

What is meant by zero in context here is not nessisarilly what modern mathematics considers to be zero. Here we are looking for symbols that represent nothing, naught, none, void, absence and emptiness. The 0 digit is used to signify nothing as well as no symbol or no numeral. In the number 0.618 the zero does not mean nothing, but no numeral. If it did mean nothing then we would have a negative number (-.618). But .618 is not negative, because 0 does not mean nothing here. If the zero in 108 actually meant nothing, then either the one or the eight would be negative, while the number on the other side would be positive. Otherwise 108 would make no sense. This means that zero is often used in mathematics to mean the oposite of nothing. Only when the zero stands alone does it truly mean nothing. As in the zeros in this equation, 0×1=0.

Babalonians borrowed the base ten number system from Sanskrit. From there they were conveyed to western civilization by Leonardo Fibonacci, who also discovered the Golden Ratio or Phi. Phi is the praportion (1.618) to which the entire universe conforms. Sumerian, being the supposed oldest written language of man, marks the beginning of real-time recorded history. Just as Jesus’ birth is used to mark the zero point between BC and AD, so the founding of Sumer can be seen as a zero point between prehistory and history, as it is the beginning of our modern ability to understand an ancient written word. Sumer is almost certainly not the actual beginning of writing; as we well know that the origin of writing is not well known. The accepted record of writing, has its full development popping up suddenly,  as they say “seamingly over night”.

There is no record of a Sumerian form of the base ten system, and not, in particular, that of zero. The first known zero is the Sanscrit 0. It is possible, but debated, that some Babylonians may have possessed a concept of zero, but nowhere else did any civilization contemplate nothingness mathematically and develop a symbol for it except for the Hindus and Mayans; that is, according to mainstream accademia nuts. Yet as we examine these facts in the subjective manner, by which the reader is no doubt aquainted with by now, let us see if along the way, we don’t happen upon some other objective possibilities.

Inscription K-127, from Sambor on Mekong.

hindu zeroPhoto Credit: Debra Gross Aczel

The veryfirst recorded zero is the dot in the middle, to the right of the spiral-looking character, which is a 6 in Old Khmer.

Our zero is written, either just as its Hindu ancestor, a circle, or like the Mayan zero, an oval shape tilted by 90°. To the Maya it was a conch shell (presumably empty) which represented nothingness. Mayan-symbol-for-zeroThe top portion of this symbol is a chalice, the Vesica Pisces shape examined previously, and being within an oval shape, which may as well be a chalice itself, makes for a chalice within a chalice. The lower portion, illustrating the orophus of an empty conch shell, is a crescent. The chalice then is like the place holding zero where there is substance but no numeral, while zero the actual void is the crescent.

The Tao is called the Great Mother:  empty yet inexhaustible,it gives birth to infinite worlds.

Chapter 5, Tao Te Ching

Because it is ruffly the shape of an egg and is decorated with, in this case, a single large crescent and multiple small crescents, the Mayan zero also resembles an Easter egg and alludes to the idea of a cosmic or orphic egg from which the universe was born. A concept so independantly widespread, it would be simpler to list the cultures which have not derived it… if they could be found.
Of their symbol for zero, there are many variations in design used by the lost Mayan culture. In our example, with three small crescents, one might imagine a sailboat is drawn within it.

Like the ship from which the Mayan vigesimal numerals manifest or the egg from which they hatch. Oddly enough, it is often said, where one can read explanations of it, that this symbol for zero is a crescent. Although one must obviously ignore over two thirds of the image (the chalice portion) to make it so, this makes sense in light of the fact that the crescent is the emptiness of the shell.

“Thirty spokes unite at the single hub; It is the empty space which makes the wheel useful.

Mold clay to form a bowl; It is the empty space which makes the bowl useful.

Cut out windows and doors; It is the empty space which makes the room useful.”

Chapter 7, Tao Te Ching

Anyhow, the Hindu symbol of zero is seen daily, the world over, though most are unaware. It is the dot above the crescent in the Hindu Aum. The zero, “shunya” in Sanskrit, is also known as the fourth state “turiya”.

From wikipedia;

(Gaudapada wrote or compiled[7] the Māṇḍukya Kārikā, also known as the Gauḍapāda Kārikā and as the Ä€gama Śāstra.[note 1]

In this work, Gaudapada deals with perceptionidealismcausalitytruth, andreality. The fourth state, (turÄŤya avasthā), corresponds to silence, as the other three correspond to AUM. It is the substratum of the other three states. It is, states Nakamura, atyanta-shunyata (absolute emptiness).[8]


The crescent underneath zero represents the Hindu concept of Maya. Maya is the illusion of substance, the separation from Turiya (zero). From this knowledge we can subjectively identify Maya as one; seeing how one is the first separation from zero.
More incredible is the fact that the number one in Mayan numbers is a dot, Just like the Hindu zero. So the Mayan symbol for one is a dot, while zero is a, so called, “crescent” and, subjectively, a Hindu symbol for one is a crescent, while their zero is a dot. imageHere we have two symbols, a crescent and a dot, representing two meanings respectively in the Hindu Indian culture. Then the same meanings being used with very similar symbols by the Mayan Indians, accept the designations of the two meanings are swapped with the respective symbols. All the while the name given by one of the two Indian cultures to one of the two symbols is the very same name of the other “indian” culture; namely Maya. All this, supposedly, put into place long before these two “Indian” peoples could have ever crossed paths being that they exist on oposite sides of the globe, whose spherical nature was also, suposedly, discovered on the same voyage, by the same seafarrer who discovered the new indian continent  and labeled the natives thereof, including the Mayan’s, “Indians”, because he mistakenly thought he had landed in India.

So what has all this zero and one in Mayan and Hindu cultures got to do with fish?
First of all, remember the Egyptian mountain of the setting Sun called Manu discussed in ICHTHYOS 2?

The symbolism is quite similar and the meanings also intersect subjectively through the phonetics of the name for the double lion god, “Aker” and the English word acre.

According to its etymology, the original meaning of the English word acre, “without reference to dimension”, is preserved by the term “God’s acre”. A double is a plural so we are refering above to the gods Aker.

acre (n.) 
Old English ĂŚcer “tilled field, open land,” from Proto-Germanic *akraz “field, pasture” (source also of Old Norse akr, Old Saxon akkar, Old Frisian ekker, Middle Dutch acker, Dutch akker, Old High German achar, German acker, Gothic akrs), from PIE *agro- “field” (source also of Latin ager “field, land,” Greek agros, Sanskrit ajras “plain, open country”).

Originally in English without reference to dimension; in late Old English the amount of land a yoke of oxen could plow in a day, afterward defined by statute as a piece 40 poles by 4, or an equivalent shape (5 Edw. I, 31 Edw. III, 24 Hen. VIII). Original sense retained in God’s acre “churchyard.”

The Muslim concept of Alah having no image is represented by the crescent and star, just as the lingam of the Hindus illustrates a formless god and the term God’s acre refers to no specific  dimension.

That is only a soft connection, but a more solid parallel to fish symbolism comes in two steps.

1. The arabic letter Nun, (phonetically “noon”) is a crescent and dot, similar to the crescent moon and star used to symbolize Islam and exactly the same as the Hindu Shunia and Maya (zero and one).

2. The Hebrew word and letter Nun (none)  stands for (drumroll) FISH!


imageBecause of the Hebrew meaning fish and the homily between the Arrabic and Hebrew Nun, the American made terrorist orgonization called ISIS or ISIL began graffiti labeling the Arabbic Nun on Christian households. The end result of which is that Christians, who are always eager to prove Biblical prophecy and match, or even one up, the recorded levels of their cousins’,  (the Hebrew’s) persecutions, embraced the symbol proudly as another sign of the Christian Ichthys.

looks like nun, sounds like noon. Which plays nicely itself with zero, via the clock. 12 being noon (mid-day) and the zulu (military time) zero (zero hundred hours) or midnight.

Noon and none; the Sun and the crescent Moon.

We will return to nun several times here and again in the next eddition of ICHTHYOS.

The Egyptians may also have had a mathematical zero after all. This Heiroglyph was often even used as a zero point, with a negative count and a positive, as in 3 2 1-0+1 2 3. Here is a quote to support the claim.
From, The Crest Of The Peacock, by Joseph George Gheverghese.                                     Chapter 3 The Beginnings Of Egypt, Page 86.

“The absence of zero is a shortcoming of Egyptian numeration that is  often referred to in histories of mathematics. It is clear that an absence of  zero as a placeholder is perfectly consistent with a number system such as  the Egyptian system. However, in two other senses it may be argued, as  Lumpkin (2002, pp. 161–67) has done, that the concept of zero was present  in Egyptian mathematics. First, there is zero as a number. Scharff (1922,  pp. 58–59) contains a monthly balance sheet of the accounts of a traveling  royal party, dating back to around 1770 BC, which shows the expenditure  and the income allocated for each type of good in a separate column. The  balance of zero, recorded in the case of four goods, is shown by the nfr symbol that corresponds to the Egyptian word for “good,” “complete,” or  “beautiful.” It is interesting, in this context, that the concept of zero has a positive association in other cultures as well, such as in India (sunya) and  among the Maya (the shell symbol). 

The same nfr symbol appears in a series of drawings of some Old Kingdom constructions. For example, in the construction of Meidun Pyramid,  it appears as a ground reference point for integral values of cubits given as  “above zero” (going up) and “below zero” (going down). There are other  examples of these number lines at pyramid sites, known and referred to by  Egyptologists early in the century, including Borchardt, Petrie, and Reiner,  but not mentioned by historians of mathematics, not even Gillings (1972), who played such an important role in revealing the treasures of Egyptian  mathematics to a wider public. About fifteen hundred years after Ahmes,  in a deed from Edfu, there is a use of the “zero concept as a replacement to  a magnitude in geometry,” according to Boyer (1968, p. 18). Perhaps there  are other examples waiting to be found in Egypt.”

Is it not striking, how much the bottom section of this Egyptian zero glyph (NFR) resembles the Mayan zero conch shell glyph, while the crescent and oval resemble the Sanskrit and Arabic symbols?

 Wait till you see what is next.

Hebrews are said to have no digit for zero; what they do have is a word for nothing which apears in Strong’s as H369 Ayin.

Here’s a string of objectively tangent subjectivity that leads up to the fish, wich is coming up again anyhow.

I wonder… What would Nikolai Tesla have to say about the 369 reference in Strong’s Hebrew Numbers being associated with a word for nothing?

“If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have the key to the universe.”

Nikolai Tesla

Espescialy if he also took the following into consideration with the rest of this fishy nun stuff.

√153 = 12.3693168769 = The number of full moons per year. Take the average number of days in an annual cycle and divide by the average days between lunar cycles, the result is √153.

Ayin the letterNow it is quite astounding that the Hebrews also have a silent letter called ayin, which means eye, whose cursive form is the fish symbol, and the ancient pictograph happens to resemble the Sanskrit, Egyptian and Mayan zero and is more exactly shaped like a chalice.

But it is meant to look like what the letter represents, an eye.

“The letter ע Ayin (16) is the outcome of the action of the ×  Nun (14) through ץ Samech (15)…

… If you took a ×  Nun, which represents the fish that swims in the waters of life, and you make that ×  Nun active, it spins, it goes into motion, it creates a circle, which is ×Ą Samech. So when Nun, the fourteenth Hebrew letter, is put into activity, it activates all the forces of the Ain Soph, the primordial energies of existence, represented by the fifteenth letter,ץ Samech. Yet, the direction of that spin is determined by the results of your actions.”

Ayin is a fork in the road, the every day moments where one makes a choice between good or bad action. A Yin and Yang which brings us back to crescents and dots.

The Hindu symbols of Turiya and Maya, discussed earlier, are known as lingam and yoni (phaullus and chalice). Together they are known as lingam or Shiva Linga, the lingam is spescifically the zero represented in a phallic form, it is the form or symbol of the formless Shiva set inside the yoni, the female. Often they are accompanied by bulls.

Each Lingam in the river has a matching carving of Nandi (the Bull carrier of Lord Shiva) facing it.


The lingam is the source of all in Hinduism, “without it, there is nothing”.

Now, check out the work of Cullen Smith @

The same symbolism paired with a cow and the meaning of mother of all is found with the Egyptian goddess Hathor.

“Hathor, the Holy Heifer, symbolises the entire heavens including the Sun, the Moon and the stars. She is depicted as a cow, which is a symbol of nurture and life and by extension represents civilisation. Hathor reveals Her origins through Her headdress which consists of a solar disc surrounded by two lunar cow horns…”

Also the concept of formlessness is connected to the same symbolism in Egypt with Thoth (god of writing and wisdom) and the Udjat (Eye of Ra)

““He Who increases His form” or “Crescent” (a reference to the Moon)”

Mar., Dend. II, 31b

Now the mother aspect of zero discussed previously, paired with the imagery of crescent and circle, reflects the sun disc and crescent horns of the Egyptian mother godesses Isis and, originally, of Hathor the cow goddess.

The femanine nature of the Chalice is widely understood. But what is usually overlooked is the masculine side to it. It will be assumed that the reader is familiar with the human reproductive anatomy, so an illustration need not be provided here. The point is that not only the female but also the male reproductive/urinary orophus is a chalice shaped hole.

The Egyptian use of the crescent and dot shaped crown for both female and male deities elucidates this factor. As illustrated by the image of Thoth displayed above and the image of Ra aka Osiris and alternatly his son Horus depicted below.

The Sun God (Ra, Osiris) was also called Aten. The Aten was an aspect (source) of each god, symbolized by the Sun-disc atop their heads, until Akhenaten revolutionized the Egyptian theology with a monotheistic Sun worship.

Creator of seed in women, Thou who makest fluid into man…

…it is he who takes millions of forms from his oneness.

Pritchard, James B., ed., The Ancient Near East – Volume 1: Princeton University Press, 1958, pp. 227-230.

In this belief system Aten was the one true God, whose only representations were abstractions and who could not be anthropomorphically represented in any form including as Osiris. Aten’s symbols, like Ra, other than the Sun-disc and the adition of hands as rays, are the Ank and a dot surounded by a circle;

very much repeating the formlessness of deity we have previously seen elswhere.

Note the subjective translation from the Egyptian word Aten to the English numbers 1 and 10 (A = 1, ten = 10) more one and zero.

Now all this talk of ancient 0/1 symbolism quite reasonably brings our modern binary code to the forefront of mind. Could thier be any symbolism in the field of computing that fits in the framework of this thread of subjective wonderment?

…please wait…


…Please Stand By…



..In/Out… Off/On…


Need I say more?

Earlier we breezed passed the subject of the Golden Ratio aka Phi, 1.618, and now the reader will see how it relates symbolically to zero, one and Nun. 1.618 is called Phi, a Greek letter that just happens…To look like a one in a zero.

The most well known Egyptian hyroglyphs are the eye of Ra and the ankh, which, like the chalice, the Ayin and the lingam, is a symbol of both masculin and gemanine. The word ra, like the Hebrew word ayin, has an equivalent glyph, a horizontal chalice which means mouth, but also looks like an eye.

English accademics usually spelled this with an e (re) rather than an a (Ra), though in Ancient Egyptian there may very well have been no difference in the pronunciation of re vs Ra.


Time to take a good long look at this accademically unorthodox trail of zeros and ones.

And, just to eliminate some of the chaos for the sake of clarity, lets isolate the similar Mayan, Hindu & Egyptian zeros.

What can be surmised from all this? Should we conclude that the similar symbolism for zero is evidence and the result of an ancient connection between these civilizations, or go with the collective unconscious explenation and decide that these symbols all reflect a primal archetype of nothingness? Mainstream accademia would likely refute either explenation, but can it really be chalked up and passed off as simple, random, chance coinsidence? The author assumes no authritative rights to answering these questions, but the many synchronistic events that have taken place in time with the writing of this and other editions of this blog pulls in the direction of a deep and mysterious influence of consciousness, outside the everyday cause and effect norm of classical physics.

Here is an example of the synchronistic events that took place in time with and in relation to this chapter.

As I was writing the part about the lingam. A friend of mine, oblivious to the present content, sent me a message regarding a book by Arthur I miller called “137: Jung Pauli And The Persuit Of A Scientific Obsession“, in a thread where we share the many 153 ~ 137 synchronicities we have in our daily lives.  While viewing the following clip of that conversation keep in mind the relationship of Ayin and Nun being the spin of Nun, like the spin of an electron.

Lucy also brought my attention to the visual homily of the Cheshire cat’s smile and the diagram of an electrons light spectrum found on page 34 of the same book.

And this diagram (also Pg 34) includes the electron itself which is like adding the single eye; like the turyia, shunia or zero.

The waters of chaos are a beutiful metaphor of quantum potentiallity and the arch and dot of Nun are equally relavent symbols of the wave/particle aspect of electrons, demonstrated in the famous double slit experiments. Just as God’s observation separates the waters from the waters in the Biblical creation, so our observation apears to collapse pure potential into individual states of matter.

This same imagery can also be extracted through a view of Alice’s rabit hole paired with the Egyptian constellation of Osiris (Ra), the Sun God, on his barq (ark, arch), wich are our modern Orion and Lepus the rabit.
Now we will get to the depths of 137 eventually, but for now the reader deserves at least the basic information. Already we have discussed the equation of the challice (265á153=1.73). An anagaram can be seen between the numbers 173 and 137, but there is something of a far more profound and direct link from 137 to the subject of this work. 137 is a nick name for a law of physics, namely, the fine structure constant.It is a fundemental number found deep inside each line in a spectrum. On this number and the subject matter locked in the orbit of its enourmous gravity of meaning, no other quote is regurgitated as prolifically as the famous physicist Richard Feynman’s articulation of its importance. One of the most interesting bits from this quote is, 

“…all good theoretical physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it.”

A statement so true that, in fact, all good theoretical physicists, occultists and mystics inevitably quote it in their writings. Here follows Richard Feynmans famous quote. 

There is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the observed coupling constant, e, the amplitude for a real electron to emit or absorb a real photon. It is a simple number that has been experimentally determined to be close to -0.08542455. (My physicist friends won’t recognize this number, because they like to remember it as the inverse of its square: about 137.03597 with about an uncertainty of about 2 in the last decimal place. It has been a mystery ever since it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it.) Immediately you would like to know where this number for a coupling comes from: is it related to π or perhaps to the base of natural logarithms? Nobody knows. It’s one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man. You might say the “hand of God” wrote that number, and “we don’t know how He pushed his pencil.” We know what kind of a dance to do experimentally to measure this number very accurately, but we don’t know what kind of dance to do on the computer to make this number come out, without putting it in secretly!

Now considering the information covered in the previous chapters of ICHTHYOS and all amazing facts that will eventually be disclosed in the future and the entire body of work together, it is quite providential and aw inspiring to learn that the symbol by which any physicist will recognize this mysterious “Cosmic, or Magic Number” and the simplest form of 137 that is put up on any wall and worried about is the lower case alpha. 

the FISH represents the number for which physicists agree,

  “You might say the “hand of God” wrote that number, and “we don’t know how He pushed his pencil.”

You might say “the “hand of God” drew that symbol“, and “we don’t know how He pushed his pencil”.

ICHTHYOS 2 Manu-Fest The Hands Of Illusion

Chronologically, it seems, the first appearance of the simple form fish symbol came in the oldest confirmed text on record, which has yet to be Rosetta Stoned (translated), called Indu.

Could some of these contain the Story of Manu?

This text is from the Indus River area, on the border of Pakistan and India. This could well be the root of the Hindu culture. One of the script’s most common characters is a fish symbol standing on its tail. Often with side-kick (accent) characters. For example two to four arms, as seen below, or a single chevron over its head etc. Undeciphered text means we don’t know what meaning they used these symbols for, nor have phonetic values been confirmed. There are, however, many proposals like the following.

Vesica God

Here, the meaning of the fish symbol is given as either star or fish. Perhaps two fish would mean star fish, which might bring Pisces (two fish) to mind. The phonetic value here proposed for fish and/or star is “min”. That makes looking at the word for seven fish, or seven stars, “Elumin” very interesting, as it raises, to the English thinking mind, the word illuminate; the very nature of stars. And seven, we will see, freaquently apears in fish tales, usually as a precurser to the number eight.

In one of the very first fish stories in history, the, Hindu protagonist’s title is Manu and mankind is rescued by Matsya, a fish. These glyphs may very well have common roots with that story.

Another translation sees “God” in a Chalice formed by two chalices, which are interpreted as bracelets.


But again these are from just one of 100+ proposed translations.

If and when the Indu language is credibly deciphered, this chapter will have to be updated. For now, let me answer the question, “what is the story of Manu?”!

Manu is used in the hindu scriptures as a title for prophets or leaders designated by God. And the Sanskrit word for man is manava, which is derived directly from Manu. The most well known Manu is the current Manu who was saved with seven other men (“sages”), from the great flood, in a boat, dragged by a rope, tied to a horn on the brow of Matsya, the first and fish avatar of Vishnu!

Although the version with one Manu and “seven sages” (eight men) is the most commonly known, some versions of the story do mention the family of Manu being saved also. There are also versions where Manu is the sole survivor. It is very interesting though, that the most common Hindu flood story has in common with the biblical flood story, the number of eight survivors.

Here is my own poetic version of the Matsya Purana.

Manu’s is the story of Matsya, the first avatar of Vishnu.

Manu is to Hindu
Noah Is to Hebrew

A chosen holy man who

Cleansing himself in the river Indu


a carp fish took Manu’s hands as refuge

And pleaded, “save me from the beasts of the indu”.

So he placed the creature in a jar, but it grew.

Matsya cried as he filled the jar through,

“Please save me now, from a fate served by you.”

Again & again, Manu saved the fish avatar of Vishnu

As successively larger vessels, Matsya outgrew.

From jar to jug, then bucket, next tub,

even the Indu river, this once tiny fishling buldged right through.

Finaly the Ocean Matsya filled too!

Something about filling an Ocean struck, Manu finaly knew.

The destroyer God of the Hindu,

Was there disguised as a fish who,

In return for his kindness granted Manu a boon.

He said, “Build an ark for an 8 man crew.

The two went on to save me and you,

From the great flood known as the deluge.

Manu tied the craft to a horn
which Matsya’s forehead grew.

To a Mountain of dry land Matsya towed the ark, where either he, one alone, or the eight began anew.

Not before recovering the Vedas too


From a demon in the depths of the Ocean blue.

All thanks to Manu.

imageManu + Fish, sounds like… Manifest, the latin for which is manufestus.

The following subjective relationship, like Christopher Columbus and the title ‘Indian’, connects the eastern Indian to the western Indian. More specifically, the relationship at hand is Hindu to Mayan.

Ever since the 2012 hoaxe, perpetrated by mass media (espescially Hollywood, which means magic wand) the Mayan Calandar has become infamous. Take a close look at the two round objects on either side of the central figure.

Tell me those don’t look like both fish, and hands.

With the phonetic value of “itsak”, wp-1465801473393.gifthe Mayan Fish in Hand Hieroglyph means to manifest or conjure up.

Specifically to, “conjure an image” The hand is the intelligence responsible, the cause, while the fish is the conjured image or effect. For the average western mind, most likely, the image conjured by this image, is an image of Jesus manifestation of fish and bread for five thousand people.

Is it meaningless that fish symbol numbers 153, 8 & 17 make an appearance in the reference numbers for  Strong’s Greek concordance words that translate to manifest?

G5318. paneros- To make Visible.
G5319. phaneroĂł – Make visible or clear.
G1717. emphanĂŠs – Manifest.
G5316. phainĂł- Bring to light, cause to appear.
G5321. phanerĂłsis- Manifestation
Neuroses? Interesting.

So we have Matsya and Manu, a Mayan Hieroglyph and the Story of Jesus, with several meaningful, phonetic and symbolic connections, nodes if you will. The first connection is fish, obviously, and without the second connection (manifest) it would mean little. The third is the hand references which only apply directly to the Mayan and Hindu nodes. The imagery of Jesus with fish in hand is easily brought to mind, with several of his  manifestation stories; as demonstrated by this illustration.


Though he may have the whole world in his hands, the hands of Jesus Christ are never mentioned in the texts of these fish specific events.

Let’s return to ‘manifest’ and see how the objective and subjective break downs of the word manifest will uncover more connections and perhaps bring us round to understanding how Jesus fits in along the way.

One may be surprised to find an objective connection of the English ‘man’ to the Hindu Manu, as the etymology suggests that the English word “man” most likely came from the Hindu word “manu”. In fact both words, ‘manu’ and ‘man’, mean hand and man in latin. Also meaning hand in Latin is the word “mani”, along with the word “handus”, which reflects the title, “Hindus”. The Gothic word for man is “mannha”.

Manna as in the Hebrew bread, manifested from heaven. Recall that along with fish, Jesus also manifested loaves of bread. The Latin word “festus” can mean feast, sieze or strike. “Festus, taken as feast, would make “manna fest” a bread festival and manufestus becomes a man festival, a feast of men. Which brings rise to the canabalistic nature of the Christian tradition of communion. Apearently, whether literally or allegorically, Jesus would have you devour him.

John 6: 48 I am that bread of life. 49 Your fathers did eat manna

It is well known that Jesus is equated with logos (word), “The Living Word of God”. It is most likely that the meaning behind devouring the Word of God is to learn truth or ingest knowledge.

Now we have a new connection which reaches into every node yet articulated, namely the written word. The fish in hand glyph, the Vedas recovered by Matsya, Jesus, The Word of God and manna from heaven are all information, words; even the Mayan prophesy of salvation that actually spelled out their annihilation was a written word.

Matsya had to dive into the dark abyss to recover the Hindu sacred text. The raising of the Vedas from the depths is akin to Jesus (God’s Word) resurrecting from the pit of Hell, Just as a fish manifested in the hand is raised from the void. The reading of knowledge is the raising of unconscious information to consciousness, making the unknown known.

The most direct route to finding the word manu relating to Jesus, God, Manifest and mankind is in the English transliteration of the Hebrew title for the messiah, Immanuel. How convenient that the subjective meaning, associated via its phonetic value heard in English,

I’m Manu El,

Is essentially the same as the objective meaning of Emmanuel.

Emmanuel masc. personal name, from Greek form of Hebrew ‘Immanu’el, literally “God is with us,” from ‘immanu “with us,” from ‘im “with,” + first person plural pronomial suffix (us), + El “God.”

So im = with and El = God, which leaves manu to mean us, man. Just as the Etymology of “man” starts with “manu”. Rather than “God with us”, Immanuel could be translated as God manifest. like Vishnu (a god) and Matsya (his presence with man as a fish), so God (El) is Jesus the fish with or as man. Quite accurately, Matsya could be titled “god with manu”.

The message of oneness seems to creep through subjectively by the Hebrew word “immanu”. I’m Manu, he is Manu, he is man. The progenitor of mankind is God and God is mankind itself ie ‘I’m Manu, (signed) El’ or even I’m man U El (I am man, I am you, I am El).

The objective etymology of ‘manifest’ is like to “conjure an image” where it is defined as “to show plainly” and also takes us back to hands.

manifest (v.)
late 14c., “to spread” (one’s fame), “to show plainly,” from manifest (adj.) or else from L. manifestare “to discover, disclose, betray” (see manifest (adj.)). Meaning “to display by actions” is from 1560s; reflective sense, of diseases, etc., “to reveal as in operation” is from 1808. Related: Manifested; manifesting.
manifest (n.)
ship’s cargo,” 1706; see manifest (adj.). Earlier, “a public declaration” (c.1600; cf. manifesto), from Fr. manifeste, verbal noun from manifester. Earlier still in English as “a manifestation” (1560s).

In the Matsya Purana, Manu is the manifest, as in ships cargo.

Now some details from another source as we breakdown the word further. This time from

Originally, “that which can be seized by the hand”: compounded of Latin manus, “hand” and -festus, “seize, capble of being seized”.

It was the Spanish hand (manus), that came across the water to sieze the Mayan indians! This was only possible because the Maya held a prophecy of a white bearded man (aka Plumed Serpant) who would be their savior. And white bearded men is what the spanish were, though save the Maya, they did not.

Between the English word manifest, the spanish and latin word manu(s), the Mayan fish in hand in the manifest hieroglyph and the Hindu Myth of Vishnu (God) manifest to Manu, and the Hebrew “manu” meaning us, topped off with Mayans being struck down by Spanish manus (hands) there is incredible alignment.

And then we find this in Egypt.


Recall, “Capable of Being Siezed”… Like the Maya were by the Spanish, and the Mayan glyph being a hand gripping a fish. The meaning of “seized” is like to binding, as it means being seized. So we see the word manu in Egypt alligning with Matsya tied to the boat of Manu.

The over all meaning of manifest is making a thing out of a thought, to make actual or tangible, materialize, to make one of none, as if by magic or an unknown science.

Interestingly enough, ‘man’ and ‘manu’ bear synonymous meaning to the word manifest in Egyptian.


And a fishlike symbol is used as a magical amulet.


Slightly tangent is a name with the exact same phonetic value ‘manu’ in the Egyptian glyphs,

“MANU. . The mythical mountain on which the sun set. The region of the western horizon. One of two mountains that held up the sky, the other being BAKHU. These peaks were guarded by the double lion god, AKER”


Note: Manu is pulled to a mountain to the North, where he follows the receding waters down its slopes.
The lions will be addressed later with Sybil and Aeon.

The place where the Sun sets is the daily fate of the Sun, where the Sun is siezed by its fate. The Great Manu is also the name of the Chaldean god of fate. Unfortunately very little information is available on “The Great Manu”.

The “fest” portion of the English word manifest is from the Greek “festus,” to strike. Like so many of the cues for mirraculous events, at the moment of manifestation,where a magician often strikes an object to signify that moment of magic. A practice that goes all the way back to moses and Aaron with the rod or staff, striking the object of the comming manifestation; and beyond. This striking reference will come up again with pitch, in the resurrection of the Fish.

Conjure is an interesting word in its references to binding. It brings back to mind the birthplace of the chalice, where the two parent circles are conjoined.

late 13c., “command on oath,” from O.Fr. conjurer “invoke, conjure” (12c.), from L. conjurare “to swear together; conspire,” from com- “together” (see com-) + jurare “to swear” (see jury (n.)). Magical sense is c.1300, for “constraining by spell” a demon to do one’s bidding. Related: Conjured; conjuring. Phraseconjure up “cause to appear in the mind” (as if by magic) attested from 1580s.

Conjure then is to conspire to constrain the mind.
A conspiracy to restrict the thinking of a target’s subconscious focus on a desired image or idea.

If you have studied the subject of sovereign vs subject, you know that your birth certificate has everything to do with a ships cargo (manufest). Although that subject is worthy of a whole series of blogs on its own.
Now we are speaking of magic, holograms, mind tricks, mentalism, hypnosis and illusion.

This brings us to one last node of The Mayans And Hindus.

It turns out that “maya” is a Sanskrit word for a Hindu concept. The illusion that we are separated. The Mayans fell for Maya (illusion) based on prior beliefs.

In the ancient Sumerian Language, “manu” means either “who” or “to count”. Now we come to the end of this edition and the begining of the next, the strange connections of the history and roots of numeric sytems. This, of course, begins at zero, begins with none. More appropriately, from this fishy perspective…





tree (n.)
Old English treo, treow “tree” (also “timber, wood, beam, log, stake”), from Proto-Germanic *treuwaz- (cognates: Old Frisian tre, Old Saxontrio, Old Norse tre, Gothic triu “tree”), from PIE*drew-o-, from *deru- “oak” (cognates: Sanskrit dru “tree, wood,” daru “wood, log;” Greek drys”oak,” drymos “copse, thicket,” doru “beam, shaft of a spear;” Old Church Slavonic drievo “tree, wood;” Serbian drvo “tree,” drva “wood;” Russian drevo “tree, wood;” Czech drva; Polish drwa”wood;” Lithuanian derva “pine, wood;” Old Irish daur, Welsh derwen “oak,” Albanian drusk “oak“). This is from PIE *drew-o-, a suffixed form of the root *deru- “to be firm, solid, steadfast” (see true), with specialized sense “wood, tree” and derivatives referring to objects made of wood.

The widespread use of words originally meaning “oak” in the sense “tree” probably reflects the importance of the oak to ancient Indo-Europeans. … For Dutch boom, German Baum, the usual words for “tree,” see beam (n.). Meaning “framework of a saddle” is from 1530s…”

Saddle, another reference to equine. Save it, but note what sits in the saddle, for the hind quarters will soon be shown as relevant.

Ok, first saw ‘blow’ and ‘blast’, now ‘baum’ and ‘boom’?! This warrants further investigation.

The words ‘bomb’ and ‘explosive’, and their relatives yield nothing to go on. This leaves us with the highly unlikely and hardley heard of ‘petard’.

petard (n.)
1590s, “small bomb used to blow in doors and breach walls,” from French pĂŠtard (late 16c.), from Middle French pĂŠter “break wind,” from Old French pet “a fart,” from Latin peditum, noun use of neuter past participle of pedere “to break wind,” from PIE root *pezd- “to fart” (see feisty). Surviving in phrase hoist with one’s own petard(or some variant) “blown up with one’s own bomb,” which is ultimately from Shakespeare (1605):

For tis the sport to haue the enginer Hoist with his owne petar (“Hamlet” III.iv.207).”

Blown up with ones own bomb in 1605?

Remember, remember, the 5th of November? Guy Fawkes ring a bell? That is the guy who nearly martyred himself trying to bomb parliament with barrels of gun powder, in the basement, right under the king’s throne. Reiterating, the man had set explosives to detonate under the ass of the king. That may seem slightly tangent now, but wait till we get to the alpha and omega! To further solidify the connection here, it should be noted that the subject of “Hamlet”, Act 3, Scene 4 is largely the killing of a King.

Line 207 is at time Mark 10:37
The 137 is by coincidence of course.This writer did not purposefully choose this video for the timing, but for the fact that it was the first video where the line was recognized.

Speaking of martyrs blown up by their own bombs should also remind us of a more current and touchy subject. Jihad. But what does a tree, bladder and fish have to do with terrorism in a holy war? This to will be set aside for later.

Now, ‘petard’ as flatulence.
True, the content of this research is, again getting really trashy, but what can be done when simply following the lead of facts into the sewer of etymology?

May as well have a laugh along the way. After all this vulgar, tragic comedy has surfaced with Shakespeare, a man who’s name alone rings vulgar bells of phallic resonance.

Speaking of subjectively phallic names, also phonetically related petard (petar as Shakespeare would have it), Peter, the son of Jonah or John, is now of interest again.

As John (Johnson-peter-phallus) Michel stated earlier, in the story of Jesus walking on water, the only disciple to walk with him there was Peter (Matthew 14:22-33), who literally fished a shekel to pay the temple tax for himself and Jesus (Matthew 17:24-27). Of course, more on this later.

In the Gospel of John, like a Good Shepard, Peter was the one to drag 153 miraculous fish, in a net, to dry land. This story takes place in the last chapter (21 & 2+1=3) of John (the third book of the New Testament). It is the third and final time Jesus appears to his disciples. Immediately after the 153 fish, Peter becomes dismayed upon the third and final time in a run that Jesus asks him if he loves him. Jesus prophecy that Peter would deny him three times before the cock crows was fulfilled, again emphasis on the last of three. Remember Jesus is said to have died at 33 and the stone (Peter) was rolled away on the third and final day of Jesus death experience.

In John 21, Peter is the co-star of the entire chapter, and the very end is very interesting.

Another man named Peter happened to be born 100 years after Guy Fawkes’ failed petard (bombing) and drowned 30 years later in 1730 aka 173. This Peter is widely considered to be the spear head of the field of Ichthyology as quoted from History of Ichthyology

by Frank Magallanes, OPEFE

“A Swede by the name of Peter Artedi (1705-1735) surfaced from the University of Uppsala, Sweden. His earliest investigation were more important than others before him. There are those who consider him the father of ichthyology. In 1728 Karl (Latinized as Carolus) Linnaeus visited this university. Linneaus inquired as to who was engaged in the study of natural history and he was then referred to Artedi. That is how they met and became friends. Each helping the other not only in personal money needs but even making an agreement that the survivor would publish the works of the one deceased. Artedi drowned in 1735 in Holland. Linnaeus true to his word published Artedi Ichthyologia in 1738.”
PS the name if that HTML file is TAXON

While reading this next paragraph, recall John Michel giving the number of the name Simon Peter as 1925 and making this the diameter of the first circle in his diagram.


In 1925 an artist named Peter Christian Breue erected a statue of a Vesica resonating Greek goddess and her son titled,


Venus und Amor
Venus and Love (Cupid) in a Vesica shaped park called Griechischeallee (Greek Alee) Park. Venus appears to be examining Cupid, or strangling him, as she has her hands around his throat; or, shall we say, his gullet. Cupids arrow lies uselessly at the base, between the gods of love. When compared in size to Cupid, the arrow looks more the size of a spear. Stains run down all sides of the monument, most noticeably along the bare bottom of Venus. Not a result of rain alone but of bird droppings left to drip only part-way to the ground. Having dried in the sun gods rays.

Now, lets look at a few translations of the term Vesica Pisces.
Two words in Hebrew ‘dag’ and ‘nun’, which is also a single letter, mean fish and ‘merorah’ means bladder.
So the Hebrew term would either be ‘dag merorah’ or ‘nun merorah’.

The Egyptian’s used a horizontal Vesica for a hieroglyph. It meant both ‘Ra’, aka Osiris (Sun god) and ‘re’, meaing mouth. The Egyptian words for bladder and fish were ‘an‘, fish and ‘as‘, bladdeb. The phrase would be rendered as ‘an as’ or as ‘as an’. These compressed give us – an assu or anas.

Note that Osiris was born on the 17th day of Athyr (Hathor- Mother goddess/Isis as a cow) and ‘annus’ means ‘year’ in Greek. So it can be said that Osiris was born on 3/17 or as it goes in Oz (Australia), 17/3 of the ‘annus’. Also Annas, was the first authority that Jesus was brought to, subsequent to his arrest.

Continuing with yet another anal reference; the next term to cover, which was alluded to above, rings of the infamous phrase “kiss my ass”.

Now, considering the influence that Greek has had on the western names of geometric shapes, one would think a Greek name would be more appropriate. So it would seem as though the Greek term “Kystis Ichthys“ was purposely avoided for whatever reason. For sure it is a term that has been completely left out of the story. Other than that, for now, the rest is left at a guess… Say poetic quality.

The Arabic word for bladder is either ‘mathaana’ or ‘buthoor’, and fish in Arabic is ‘samak’.

In an Arabic alternative etymology to the word ‘bladder’ we find that a root meaning of ‘buthoor‘ is ‘anus‘;

‘blister, pimple in Old English’ from Arabic buthoor ‘blisters’ via lexical shift, turning/th/into/d/, and /F-insertion, baDhar ‘clitoris’… or dubur ‘anus, back’…”

This means that the arbic term for bladder of fish may also be trenslated as anusfish- or ass-fish.

Strangely enough the Arabic etymology of ‘colon‘ says it is “from Arabic khurraan ‘large intestine, arse’, and the English etymology states that the Greek ‘kolon’ is of unknown origin. So this arrabic root ‘khurraan’ is the only explanation we have.That is strikingly similar to Quran or Koran! Does ‘Koran’ actually mean colon or ass?



Clearly the etymology of the words related to ‘butt’ have now become more than relavent, in fact unavoidable. As it turns out the word ‘butt’ reflects the other content in this work about as much as the rest has referred to it. There are more anal connections here than anything else. Hopefully the reader endures as the writer has had to. It is not desirable for readers to be chafed away, but the fact is that things are about to get extremely raunchy.

‘Ass’ renders nothing of interest, but it should be noted, for future reference that one meaning of ‘ass’ is donkey. ‘Ass’ was developed from ‘arse’, which will begin the end of our etymological stroll through the gutter.

arse (n.)
“buttocks,” Old English ĂŚrs “tail, rump,” from Proto-Germanic *arsoz (cognates:… Middle Dutch ĂŚrs, German Arsch “buttock”), from PIE root *ors-“buttock, backside” (cognates: Greek orros “tail, rump, base of the spine,” Hittite arrash, Armenian or “buttock,” Old Irish err “tail“). Middle English had arse-winning “money obtained by prostitution” (late 14c.)

The Hittite ‘arrash’ is contextually humorous as it manifest ‘a rash’ in the ‘arse’.

arsehole (n.)
c. 1400, arce-hoole; see arse + hole (n.). In Old English, Latin anus was glossed with earsĂ°erl, literally “arse-thrill.”

The words prostitution and ‘arse-thrill’, coming so closely together with ‘buthoor’, practically obligate the writer to inform the reader that when read aloud by several text to speech programs -which the author makes frequent use of-, the word ‘buthoor’ is read phonetically as ‘butt whore’!

Moving on…

culottes (n.)
“a divided skirt,” 1911, from French culotte”breeches” (16c.), a diminutive of cul “bottom, backside, backside, anus,” from Latin culus”bottom, fundament.”… Por le cul dieu “By God’s arse” was an Old French oath.

‘Divided skirt’ rings of a torn veil or the pulling back of the curtain. Again the power of sight.


What else should we expect to see at the checking of this box on our Todo list, but the backside of God/Oz?

The word evolve will surface via routes other than its etymological cognate to vulva later, but keep evolution in mind, add to it that French oath, ‘By the ass of God’ and recall ‘petard’; all from the etymological study of names for the Chalice, the source of everything (big bang), how could one not be driven to the following imagery and all inclusive theory of everything?

God’s buttocks spoke (petarded) the big bang and it was.


The universe is but(t) a Holy Shart!

anus (n.)
“inferior opening of the alimentary canal,” 1650s, from Old French anus, from Latin anus “ring, anus,” from PIE root *ano- “ring.” So called for its shape; compare Greek daktylios “anus,” literally “ring (for the finger),” from daktylos “finger.”

annulus (n.) 1560s, medical, from misspelling of Latin anulus “little ring, finger ring,” a diminutive of anus…

This rings of wedding rings, of which there are two. Rings are circles and thus, through the binding of marriage, arises another, intersection of two circles aka Vesica Pisces.

Naturally the word ‘anal’ would follow anus, and although nothing the reader doesn’t already know can be gained from the etymology, it is worth mentioning the use of anal as a verb, meaning to engage in sodomy. Particularly in the present, when the attempt by gays is being made to nullify DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in the US and legitimize their engagements around the world.

Interestingly enough, the constitutional appointment of the powers of creating law, may well be the annulment of recent marriage certificates in the US.

The waters here will get extremely ruff on the “PC”, and the author means no offence in allowing the following content to surface naturally or etymologically.

The pride flag, most will know, is a rainbow flag, and has played a prominent role in the effort for equal “rights” in marriage. Along the way the term “gay flag” has been flailing about the social scene
as much as the thing itself. Due to its derogatory nature, the term “fag flag” has been used in attacks against the movement. So note the etymological relationship of these two words, and how they bring us right back round to multiple topics covered above.

fag (v.1)
“to droop, decline in strength, become weary” (intransitive), 1520s, of uncertain origin;… OED is content with the “common view” that it is an alteration of flag (v.) in its sense of “droop, go limp.” Transitive sense of “to make (someone or something) fatigued, tire by labor” is first attested 1826. Related: Fagged; fagging.

“fag (n.1)
British slang for “cigarette” (originally, especially, the butt of a smoked cigarette), 1888, probably from fag “loose piece, last remnant of cloth” (late 14c., as in fag-end “extreme end, loose piece,” 1610s)

fag (v.2)
“put to work at certain duties, compel to work for one’s benefit,” 1806, from British public school slang fag (n.) “junior student who does certain duties for a senior” (1785), from fag (v.1). Related: Fagdom (1902); faggery “fatiguing labor” (1853).

faggot (n.1)
late 13c., “bundle of twigs bound up,” also fagald,faggald, from Old French fagot “bundle of sticks” (13c.), of uncertain origin, probably from Italian faggotto “bundle of sticks,” diminutive of Vulgar Latin *facus, from Latin fascis “bundle of wood” (see fasces).

Especially used for burning heretics (emblematic of this from 1550s), so that phrase fire and faggot was used to indicate “punishment of a heretic.” Heretics who recanted were required to wear an embroidered figure of a faggot on the sleeve as an emblem and reminder of what they deserved.faggot (n.2)
“male homosexual,” 1914, American English slang, probably from earlier contemptuous term for “woman” (1590s), especially an old and unpleasant one, in reference to faggot (n.1) “bundle of sticks,” as something awkward that has to be carried (compare baggage “worthless woman,” 1590s). It may also be reinforced by Yiddish faygele “homosexual” (n.), literally “little bird.” It also may have roots in British public school slang noun fag “a junior who does certain duties for a senior” (1785), with suggestions of “catamite,” from fag (v.). This also spun off a verb (see fag (v.2).

He [the prefect] used to fag me to blow the chapel organ for him. [“Boy’s Own Paper,” 1889]

Other obsolete British senses of faggot were “man hired into military service merely to fill out the ranks at muster” (1700) and “vote manufactured for party purposes” (1817).

The explanation that male homosexuals were called faggots because they were burned at the stake as punishment is an etymological urban legend. Burning sometimes was a punishment meted out to homosexuals in Christian Europe (on the suggestion of the Biblical fate of Sodom and Gomorrah), but in England, where parliament had made homosexuality a capital offense in 1533, hanging was the method prescribed. Use of faggot in connection with public executions had long been obscure English historical trivia by the time the word began to be used for “male homosexual” in 20th century American slang, whereas the contemptuous slang word for “woman” (in common with the other possible sources or influences listed here) was in active use early 20c., by D.H. Lawrence and James Joyce, among others.”

fasces (n.)
1590s, from Latin fasces “bundle of rods containing an axe with the blade projecting” (plural of fascis “bundle” of wood, etc.), from Proto-Italic *faski- “bundle,” perhaps from PIE*bhasko- “band, bundle” (cognates: Middle Irishbasc “neckband,” Welsh baich “load, burden,” perhaps also Old English bĂŚst “inner bark of the linden tree”). Carried before a lictor, a superior Roman magistrate, as a symbol of power over life and limb: the sticks symbolized punishment by whipping, the axe-head execution by beheading. Hence in Latin it also meant, figuratively, “high office, supreme power.”

fagoting (n.)
in embroidery, 1885, from faggot (n.1) “bundle.” So called from the threads tied together in the middle.

Once again the concwpt of a net is reflected as these etymologies are collected into a ‘faggot‘.

“fagus (n.)
botanical genus of beech trees, from Latin fagus”beech,” from PIE root *bhagos “beech tree” (cognates: Greek phegos “oak,” Latin fagus”beech,” Russian buzina “elder,” Old English bece, Old Norse bok, German Buche “beech”), perhaps with a ground sense of “edible” (and connected with the root of Greek phagein “to eat;” see -phagous). Beech mast was an ancient food source for agricultural animals across a wide stretch of Europe.

The restriction to western IE languages and the reference to different trees have suggested to some scholars that this word was not PIE, but a later loanword. In the Balkans, from which the beech started to spread after 6000 BC, the [Greek] word means ‘oak,’ not ‘beech.’ Yet ‘oak‘ and ‘beech’ are both ‘fruit-bearing trees,’ so that a semantic shift from ‘oak’ to ‘beech’ appears quite conceivable. The word itself may then have been PIE after all. [de Vaan]

The word ‘flag’ was touched on earlier in the sense of drooping for its relationship of meaning to ‘nether’ (downward) and its visual apearence in the Egyptian hieroglyph for ‘neter’ (god). It has now manifested again in relating to ‘fag’, so we will look more into its etymologies.

“flag (n.1)
“cloth ensign,” late 15c….
of unknown origin, but likely connected to flag (v.1)”

flag (n.2)
“flat stone for paving,” c. 1600… Earlier in English as “piece cut from turf or sod” (mid-15c.), from Old Norse flag “spot where a piece of turf has been cut out,”…”

This “piece cut from turf” reflects a portion of the root of gall (n2)”‘oak-gall’, a bare spot in a field”.

Now we come to an entire sphere of barren land, the farthest man has ever traveled to erect a flag.

Other than the word ‘luna’ being ‘anul’ backwards, the moon is subjectively connected to the bare ass by the taunting of others via literally showing ones ass being called mooning. This brings us to ‘annular’.


Annular solar eclipse at AustraliaTwitter/@zadhli
“annular (adj.)
“ring-shaped,” 1570s… An annular eclipse (1727) is one in which the dark body of the moon is smaller than the disk of the sun, so that at the height of it the sun appears as a ring of light…”

butt (n.1)
“thick end,” c. 1400, butte, which probably is related to Middle Dutch and Dutch bot, Low German butt “blunt, dull,” Old Norse bauta (see beat (v.)). Or related somehow to Old English buttuc “end, small piece of land,” and Old Norse butr “short.” In sense of “human posterior” it is recorded from mid-15c. Meaning “remainder of a smoked cigarette” first recorded 1847.butt (v.)
“hit with the head,” c. 1200, from Anglo-French buter, from Old French boter “to push, shove, knock; to thrust against,” from Frankish or another Germanic source (compare Old Norsebauta, Low German boten “to strike, beat”), from Proto-Germanic *butan, from PIE root *bhau- “to strike” (see batter (v.)). Related: Butted; butting. To butt in “rudely intrude” is American English, attested from 1900.

butt (n.2)
“liquor barrel,” late 14c., from Anglo-French but and Old French bot “barrel, wineskin” (14c., Modern French botte), from Late Latin buttis”cask” (see bottle (n.)). Cognate with Spanish and Portuguese bota, Italian botte. Usually a cask holding 108 to 140 gallons, or roughly two hogsheads, but the measure varied greatly.

butt (n.3)
target of a joke,” 1610s, originally “target for shooting practice” (mid-14c.), from Old Frenchbut “aim, goal, end, target (of an arrow, etc.),” 13c., which seems to be a fusion of Old French words for “end” (bout) and “aim, goal” (but), both ultimately from Germanic. The latter is from Frankish *but “stump, stock, block,” or some other Germanic source (compare Old Norse butr”log of wood“), which would connect it with butt(n.1).

butt (n.4)
“flat fish,” c. 1300, a general Germanic name applied to various kinds of flat fishes; compare Old Swedish but “flatfish,” German Butte, Dutch bot, perhaps ultimately related to butt (n.1). “Hence butt-woman, who sells these, a fish-wife.” [OED]

We have now arived at fish via the flattfish aka buttfish, and a cod is aka an assfish!

The only difference between the Chalice and the symbol of a fish is the the tail. The first image germinated from the Chalice is the fish, simply by sprouting a tail from its bottom.